Winning the Battle, Losing the War. Really?!

As I read twitter posts from Christians it becomes apparent that we “Christ-followers” have lost the ability to win graciously.  I rarely write about current events.  I don’t intentionally avoid being topical and, even though I usually start my posts with a verse from the Bible, I certainly don’t consider my writing expository.  But the current twitter debate concerning same sex marriages distresses me.

Many of the posts by those over 40 years old ring with “nana nana, boo boo.”  They make sure to point out that a majority of states either ban or remain tacit on the subject of same sex marriages.  Others brag about “being right” along with undertones of “God loves us better than He loves you.”  Really?  If a vote goes against my position does that mean that God loves me less?  The Bible describes God’s love for me, and you, as infinite.  My limited understanding of math is that you can neither add to nor take away from infinite.

This  whole thing reminds me of the Buffalo Bills during their Superbowl years.  The Bills of the late Eighties and early Nineties did very little celebrating in the end zone.  Their philosophy under coach Marv Levy was that end zone celebrations were for teams that didn’t score often.

If you haven’t read all the way to the end of the Bible, or at least skipped ahead, I’m about to ruin the climax for you (*spoiler alert).  Not only has the touchdown already been scored, the game has already been won.  Jesus great lesson for us is to be gracious winners.  He certainly was.  If anyone had the privilege of an end zone dance it was Jesus.  He could have jigged it up and spiked a fish…er, football, on the shore when He told Peter to cast his nets on the other side.  Over and over Jesus had opportunity to say “I told you so,” but instead recognized that His Kingdom is not about being right, it’s about being reconciled.  In fact, the only time that I find Him coming close to saying “I told you so” is when He describes Heaven that is being prepared for us, “In my Father’s house are many rooms; if it were not so, I would have told you…” (John 4:2).  That hardly seems like a victory dance.

It is true that we Christians are known mostly by what we are against.  I believe that’s because we celebrate more about temporal victories than we do about the Ultimate Victory.  We’ve already won.  Rubbing people’s noses in it just reveals us to be petty.

But there’s another distressing aspect to the twitter posts that I’ve been reading.  Many of these come from those under 40 and they concern “winning a battle, but losing the war.”  Really?  Loosing the war?  Again, spoiler alert.  The war is over.  While it is correct that we didn’t win the war, it is also correct that Jesus did.  At the point that we start lamenting losing the war we begin to give Satan a foothold to convince others that the outcome is still in question.

I believe that much of this thought process comes from the culture that surrounds us depicting life as a battle between good and evil.  It’s a Star Wars mentality.  Concerning ourselves with whether we need to concede ground in order to win the war is what lead to ten out of twelve spies convincing the rest of Israel not to taking the land God already had promised them.  My fear is that many Christians love their friends, but don’t love them enough to confront sin.  God wants everyone to be saved (I Timothy 2:4).  The aversion to confronting sin is denying the power of God to see everyone saved.  Do I think that everyone will go to heaven?  Hardly.  But if it’s God’s desire, then I want it to be my desire.

It is true that Christians have lost the culture war (please read “Stop Shooting the Prisoners”).  However, I’m afraid that we’re in danger of not rescuing the prisoners.  I’m afraid that when we don’t build relationships that are strong enough to withstand confrontation, and then actually confront, then we’re simply helping someone feel good about themselves until the inevitable happens.

My fear is that we’ve lost either the ability to love in confrontation or the ability to confront in love.  And this is a dilemma that will perplex Christians until we no longer see “through a glass, darkly.”  Funny, that phrase is in the “Love Chapter.”  Hmm…

Posted in Insurgent Love, Thinking Outloud | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Love 41 – Where Receiving is Giving

“Blessed is he who considers the poor; The LORD will deliver him in time of trouble. The LORD will preserve him and keep him alive, and he will be blessed on the earth; You will not deliver him to the will of his enemies. The LORD will strengthen him on his bed of illness; You will sustain him on his sickbed.” Psalm 41:1-3

It’s been quite a while since I posted something in the Insurgent Love series.  Learning about Love 41 has brought me back home, so to speak.  Oh, and Mother’s Day is coming up (you’ll understand why I mention Mothers’ Day in a few minutes).

Love 41 is a for profit apparel and jewelry company…  ”Wait!  What? C’mon, Joe!  You’ve wandered from the straight and narrow, you capitalist pig.”

Hang on, hang on.  Let me finish…Love 41 is a for profit apparel and jewelry company whose “profits from [their] business will support programs working to get children off the streets [of Rowanda] and out of the dumps and putting them in school. Our vision is to get vulnerable women out of prostitution and into a sewing program or beauty school so they can earn a living and feed their children without needing to sell their bodies.  We desperately want to get older boys into vocational programs so they too, can have a future.”

Suzette Munson, founder of Love 41 and wife of Dave Munson (saddlebackleather.com) talks of her experience on a trip to Rowanda…

“We saw men that lost their entire family and bore the scars of unconscionable acts of torture.  Our [adopted] son Athanase was one of these people. His parents were killed when he was 3 years old and he bears a scar on his forehead of his near death experience. At age 3, he began his life on the streets, alone and with no one to care for him. At the age of 4 he began sniffing glue and at the age of 8 he was already in and out of jails. His home was often the city dump.”

Boom! Insurgent love.  Getting behind the lines of both capitalism and rampant poverty and genocide and tragedy and starvation and…

Something else that caught my eye is that Love 41 isn’t reinventing the wheel.  Suzette looked for where God is already at work and got on board.

“Love 41 is currently working through Africa New Life Ministries www.anlm.org since they’re already loving people in significant ways. ANLM has their financial books wide open and is a member of the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability www.ecfa.org where they audit their books.”

Check out the whole story at http://www.love41.com/love-41-story. And buy something for Mom, too.  Mom will love it both for what she receives and for what Love 41 gives.

Posted in Insurgent Love | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Book Review – “Quit Going to Church” by Bob Hostetler

I’ve always wanted to be able to quote Larry the Cucumber with sincerity and authenticity. Bob Hostetler has given me the chance with his newest book, Quit Going to Church. “I laughed. I cried. It moved me, Bob.” If you don’t get the joke, go watch Veggie Tales “Dave and the Giant Pickle”. I’ll wait to finish the review until you get back.

Back already? Good. I continue…

My experience is that relevant books don’t share brand new revolutionary ideas. Rather they resonate and affirm brand new revolutionary ideas that have been percolating in our minds. The books that we enjoy the most crystalize and put into words nebulous thoughts that we’ve had before, but hadn’t articulated. “Quit Going to Church” is just such a book.

The first chapter is also the title chapter, kind of like the title track on an album. As you consider the apparently contrarian title and read the first book it becomes apparent that Bob is setting the table for those of us that have been in church for a while. Bob doesn’t seem to intend this book for those who are dissatisfied with church, but rather for those of us that have been operating on auto-pilot. While reading the first chapter I was reminded of a phrase that we’re fond of around here, “Just because you’re in a church building doesn’t mean that you’re part of the church that God is building.”

It was in chapter two that I cried. No, really, I cried. The picture of prayer toward the end of this chapter is alone worth the price of the book, but please read the whole thing.

Chapter three? That’s where I laughed. Trust me. Read it. If you follow Bob on twitter (which I strongly recommend), then you know that his books won’t leave you in want of laughs, chortles, snorts and guffaws.

And thus “Quit Going to Church” flows. One chapter after the next challenges many dear, and might I say idolatrous, beliefs that we have held about Christianity for centuries, but aren’t found in Scripture. And Bob doesn’t lack in Scriptural support in the points made. It’s refreshing to see so many Biblical addresses in the footnotes. Some readers may be put off by the author’s use of Hebrew, Greek and sources that may seem pedantic. I offer the encouragement that Bob puts the cookies on the bottom shelf so that even I can reach them.

For those that have attended one of Worship Concepts Network’s “AWEthentic Worship Experience” conferences, you will recognize why “Quit Going to Church” resonates with me on many levels. The chapter “Quit Sharing Your Faith” reveals how we often view “pre-saved” persons as commodities rather than as people. “Quit Volunteering” echoes our own “Differences between slaves and servants.” Chapter ten is “Quit trying to Be Good”…wow, simply wow. And “Quit Enjoying Worship” is hereafter on the Worship Concepts Network required reading list.

Bob is well read and it is evident in this offering. Many of the themes in “Quit Going to Church” will be familiar to well-read Christians. But Bob is successful at unpacking many of them in a new light. I confess that Bob quotes some sources, pastors, and authors with whom I have serious theological differences. However, we can often learn the most from those with whom we disagree. To my regular blog readers, who might be put off by certain “names” that are bandied about in unflattering terms by evangelicals, please receive their words as you would themselves as persons…in Christ’s love.  Just as not everything that we say is “good”, not everything said by those with whom we disagree is “evil.”

If there is one place where “Quit Going to Church” doesn’t resonate with me, it’s in “Quit Living in the Center of God’s Will.” When addressing God’s will for our lives and living “by faith” there is the risk of sharing stories of victory and saying, “Look, it worked there. So and so stepped out in faith, defying all reason and sanity, and God delivered the victory!” The final chapter here is more balanced than most in this regard, but it still draws on a story of victory. When I read such accounts and interpretations I want to ask, “What about those in Hebrews 11:35-40? What about the martyrs? What faith did they lack that they didn’t get to see the promise fulfilled?”

Bob is clever and creative in his approach and the Bible story that he uses is unique. In order to avoid a “spoiler alert” I’ll simply say that he continues a contrarian approach. However, the protagonist in the illustration maintained his faith and was victorious. Frankly, I want to hear from those that were “defeated”, those that didn’t see the promise fulfilled in their lifetime, and remained faithful.

OK, that’s out of the way. Now go read Bob Hostetler’s “Quit Going to Church.” Each chapter concludes with a specific and practical prayer. Read each chapter prayerfully and to paraphrase Larry the Cucumber, “You’ll laugh. You’ll cry. Where you need to be firm, God will shore up your foundation. Where you need to be moved, God will draw your heart toward His.”

Posted in Thinking Outloud | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Lightning Arrestors and Other Unsuspecting Sacrifices

“I am the good shepherd.  The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep.” John 10:11

If you’ve followed my twitter feed for more than 10 minutes you know that I’m an amateur radio operator.  A “HAM” in the vernacular.  Amateur radio is quite an excellent fit for my Myers-Briggs personality profile, INTJ.  In particular, INTJ’s are most comfortable when things make sense.  We not only like things to work, we like to know how and why they work.  We want the world to make sense.  In HAM radio, an understanding of electrical theory is invaluable, even indispensable.  Also, much to the boredom of those closest to us, we want everyone in our circle to know about our hobby along with the why and the what.

If you’re reading this, you’re in my circle so let me tell you about amateur radio (my wife would really appreciate me talking to someone else about it for a few minutes).

HAM radio antennas, both those huge monstrosities that resemble something E.T. might use to phone home or the modest vertical pole that I use, make excellent lightning rods.  Of course, that’s not their purpose, but even the smallest rumble of thunder can strike terror into the heart of a HAM.  Therefore, we have several strategies that we employ to protect thousands of dollars worth of equipment against lightning damage.

If a particularly severe lightning storm is impending we will disconnect the wire leading from the antenna.  This is rather cumbersome and renders the radio useless until the storm has passed.  For other less severe weather events, ranging from cloudless skies to mild-storms, we put loops in the cable (lighting prefers straight lines) or we use devices called “lightning arrestors” that are placed along the cable in between the antenna and the radio. In the former case, the lightning will “loop” back round on itself, effectively blocking its own path.  The electrons collide and effectively blow up the cable similar to a fuse blowing to stop the flow of electricity.  Regarding the latter, lightning arrestors filled with some non-conductive material impedes the flow of electrons.  Like the looped cable, the energy is dispersed through the destruction of the device.  In both cases, the destructive energy is rendered inert long before it can enter the house.  (I warned you that it would be boring, but please stay with me just another paragraph or so.)

Both strategies employ similar tactics.  A length of antenna feed-line routinely costs between $75 – $100.  Lightning arrestors often cost even more.  Both have but one purpose: to be destroyed.  In these here parts $75 is some serious coin, but that’s less than ten percent of the cost of most amateur radios.

Better expressed, both have but one purpose: to sacrifice themselves in order to save something much more valuable.  Both only work once.  Before they are needed, both devices add nothing to the performance of the station.  After they have done their job, well, in most cases they don’t exist anymore having vaporized in an acrid smelling puff of smoke.

At this point it would seem that I have a clever analogy for Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross for us.  Unfortunately, I don’t.  The more accurate analogy would be that the radio gives up its life to protect the wire or the arrestor.

What?  That makes no sense!  Why sacrifice a $1500 radio in order to save a $50 piece of wire?  Precisely.

Jesus’ sacrifice doesn’t make sense…at least not by earthly standards.  It would have cost infinitely less for me to die than for the Son of God to be crucified.  If it had been me on The Cross of Calvary my name wouldn’t even be a footnote in ancient history.  No one would have cared.  There would be no mad raving anti-”Joe”istian atheists ranting.  There wouldn’t be any “sheep in wolves in sheep’s clothing” false profits.  There wouldn’t be anyone manipulating religion for the own purposes.  Why?  Because a cheap “tool” has no value, no power, no meaning when it is used up.  Who cares when “good for nothing” ceases to exist?  But when the “Radio” gives itself up for the tool people take notice, it means something.

Fortunately, God doesn’t calculate worth the way that I do.  I’m not valuable because of the purpose that I serve; my worth doesn’t come from earning potential or what I can “do for the Kingdom.”  At the risk of mixing metaphors, it’s the Good Shepherd that lays down His life; not the “good for nothing” shepherd.  Understanding God’s sacrifice of His only Son, Jesus’ willingness to give Himself up on my behalf, requires that I know who is who.  The “Radio” sacrificed itself for the cable so that the cable might be valuable.

That’s why worship.

Posted in Authentic Worship Experience, Thinking Outloud | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Dead Tell No Tales (nor do they stand on their head)

“When they heard this, they praised God.  Then they said to Paul: ‘You see, brother, how many thousands of Jews have believed, and all of them are zealous for the law.’” Acts 21:20

To put this verse in context, James and the elders were requesting that Paul demonstrate his bona fides, his street creds, by showing some observance of the ceremonial law.  Evidently some of Paul’s teachings were being twisted to discount the law.  In a cultural context talking down the law was like talking about yo’ mama.  Paul wasn’t talking down the law, but wasn’t emphasizing it as much as some of the “ol’ timers” would have preferred.  Of course Paul could have set them straight, but he realized that Kingdom relationships aren’t about being right, they’re about being reconciled.  Paul also realized that the law was powerless under the New Covenant.  It wasn’t irrelevant, just powerless, so he decided that this wasn’t a mountain to die on.  In his incomparable style Matthew Henry addresses this passage this way, “It [the law] was dead, but not buried; dead, but not yet deadly.”

When you get right down to it, the law has always been powerless.  In and of themselves laws have never made anybody do anything.  Anyone at anytime can chose to either obey or not obey a law, but the law doesn’t “make” someone exhibit a certain behavior.  Even threatened punishment can’t force someone to obey any given law.  It might cause a potential law breaker to reconsider, but ultimately obeying, or disobeying, a known law is a choice.  Sometimes laws are broken as a result of ignorance or inability, but still the law was powerless to dictate behavior.

Laws only have the power granted by those that obey them.  A law can be passed that requires everyone to stand on their head for two hours everyday (absurd, I know, but work with me here).  Some would obey willingly and some begrudgingly in order to avoid punishment.   Others would intend to obey, but would fail due to inability (this would be me).  Others would decide to blatantly disobey and refuse to do it just out of rebellion.  Another group might weigh the cost of punishment and decide it’s too ridiculous to obey such a ridiculous mandate and risk any penalties.  Regardless, the “Stand on Your Head Act of 2012″ would hold no power.*

Let’s take a look back in the Old Testament at Leviticus in general and chapters 23 and 24 in particular.  Rule after rule after rule regarding worship.  Did these rules and regulations cause the Jews to be “worshipping” people?  Only as far as they did worship.  If anything, the law resulted in them being legalistic.

So, why was the law necessary?  For one thing, it kept humanity from killing itself.  Earlier I stated that laws don’t cause behavior, but they do give some people, that might otherwise be “knuckleheads”, a chance to reconsider ill-conceived intentions.  From that perspective enough people chose to obey the law that we didn’t kill each other to the point of extinction.

Also, the law gives us a point of reference, a measuring stick.  It reveals that I “fall short of the glory of God…” (Romans 3:33).  Taken out of context that’s bad news.  Without the ellipses it’s “hellfire and brimstone.”  But that’s only half of the verse, half of the story.  “And” is one of my favorite words.  “And” comes after the ellipses.  Not “but,” not “although,” not “however,” not “except.”  All of those erase what comes before.  ”And” means that what comes after is meaningless, cheap without what comes before.

We “fall short of the glory of God, and are justified freely by His grace, through the redemption that came by Jesus Christ.” (emphasis mine)

We all fall short, but without the measuring stick of the law we would never know it.  More accurately, we’re dead and without the law we wouldn’t know it.  In the words of Mister Henry, we’d be “dead, but not buried; dead, but not yet deadly.”  If you don’t bury a dead body it stinks up the place.  Jesus didn’t come to make bad people good or sick people well.  He came to give dead people life.  Some of us have been brought alive with a brand new self, but we drag the old dead carcass around with us.  Others are dead, but because we ignore the law we don’t know that we’re dead.  At best having that much dead, decaying stuff around stinks up the place.  At worst death breeds disease and more death.

Without the point of reference the law provides we have no idea how much we have to be thankful for.  Without knowing that I’ve “fallen short” I have no idea how precious is the price of my redemption.  When I start smelling the stench of death in my life it’s the law that helps me identify what it is that stinks and needs to go.  It’s the redemption that came by Jesus that leads me to bury it.

It’s the law that reminds me that I was meant to bring glory to God.  It’s the redemption of Jesus that compels me to do it.  And worship washes away the stench of death.

That’s why worship.

*Every analogy breaks down at some point and the “Stand on Your Head Act” breaks down in that in the context of Jesus and the law none of us are capable of standing on our heads because without Jesus’ redemption we’re dead.  Dead people can’t stand on their head, duh.

Posted in Thinking Outloud | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment