real words

Listening Rather Than Translating

The following is a post from the blog of a prominent pastor.  I’ve debated with myself as to whether to identify him.  One thing I try to avoid with this blog is the sniping tit-for-tat atmosphere of the blogosphere.  In fact, I agree with his points on several levels.  With that in mind, I’ve decided to keep this as anonymous as possible.  If you recognize the post please don’t try to make this a divisive thing, ’cause it ain’t and that dog just won’t hunt here.  I don’t know this pastor personally and I am making absolutely no accusation toward him.  You will “recognize them by their fruit” and from all I’ve seen at a distance is that he’s bearing some great fruit.

In other cases, with which I am personally familiar, I’m noticing a disappointing trend over the last few years.  Following this particular pastor’s post are my thoughts on this trend.

Some pastors may be tempted to read my comments and reply, “Yeh, but they started it.”  You’ll receive no argument from me there.  Yes, they did start it.  Frankly, I don’t care.  Our command is to love God because He first loved us, not love people because they first loved us.  If you’re a pastor and waiting for them to love you first…well, it ain’t gonna happen.

++++++++++++++++++++

One of the lessons I’ve learned while being in the ministry for the past 17 years is sometimes what people say isn’t exactly true…things such as…

(WARNING…you will probably only like this post if you are a pastor or a staff member of a church!)

What They Say: “I’m looking for a church that preaches the Word!”

What They Mean: “I’m looking for a church that preaches MY view of the Word. I think the BLANK translation should be used…I think BLANK should be talked about a lot while BLANK should be ignored. And if you ever stop preaching my view of the Word I will leave and tell others that you don’t preach the Word!”

What They Say: “Lot’s of people have been coming to me and saying they don’t like is…”

What They Mean: “I basically only have three friends…and all of them think exactly like me. The other night we were enjoying a time of self righteousness because, after all, we are right about everything…and were also slandering you (in the form of prayer requests) and thought it would be wise to approach you with our pet peeve. We’ve actually talked to no one else about this but said “lots” because we wanted to validate our dysfunction.”

What They Say: “I’m leaving the church.”

What They Mean: “Beg me to stay. If you will just ask me I will share with you several ways you can compromise God’s vision that He’s given you, thus becoming nothing more than a people pleasing pastor who is more interested in popularity than obedience. If you don’t bow to my demands I will remind you that I tithe and that the church needs my money, reducing you to a mere preaching whore…one who is paid for a service for the pleasure of another person.”

What They Say: “I want a church that is more focused on discipleship.”

What They Mean: “I want a church where everyone knows me and how important I am! I don’t want to reach people who are different from me, be it economic class or race or even musical preference. I already know WAY more than I do…but I somehow equate spirituality with knowledge rather than application and I rather enjoy feeling intellectually superior to those who don’t know as much as me.”

What They Say: “Don’t take this personally…but…”

What They Mean: “I am about to lower the BOOM on you…but you can’t get angry because I told you not to take it personally. Even though you have dedicated your life to this and pretty much invest every ounce of energy you have to this cause…and I think about it once or twice a week…you need to receive my attacks, even when they are personal…and you cannot retaliate because, remember, it’s not personal.”

OKAY, that was fun! I typed it all with a smile. Trust me…I’m not mad or frustrated with anyone…I just thought a pastor or two MIGHT get a smile out of this.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I’ve gotta say that I’m not smiling. As a pastor, my heart hurts. In WCN’s ministry consultation with pastors I’m noticing an increase in a “circle the wagons” attitude that is developing among pastors. As I listen to them share frustration with certain elements of their specific ministry I make it a point to ask them why they think the situation (lack of personal evangelism, engagement in worship, etc.) exists. Inevitably, they lay the onus to “get it” on the congregation. “If they just…” seems to be the phrase of choice. In some cases pastors seem downright paranoid and adversarial toward the congregation. With that, not everything disgruntled congregants say needs to be translated. Sometimes they actually say what they mean. Other times it needs to be translated from the language of being hurt.

By the way, isn’t it fascinating that this post required a warning that could be translated by an emotionally hurt congregant as “the average member of a church doesn’t have the leadership perspective we have, so they probably won’t get it.” Yes, those are actually words I heard spoken by the pastor of a mega-church where I served on staff.

Of course, as I write this I realize that I am setting myself up as an example of at least 3, and as many as 5, of the classifications. But, a more accurate translation would be, “I really hope that love does, in fact, cover over a multitude of sins, because I’m really making myself vulnerable here by appearing to disagree with a Christian leader much more prominent than myself and that my intention of iron sharpening iron is accepted and understood.”

As someone who used to be on the inside, i.e. the pastoral role, I understand the defensive mechanisms that are developed by pastors to protect themselves. I used to advocate many of them (including those specifics above). However, after being unceremoniously “kicked to the curb” by some prominent church leaders (not the one who wrote the post) I have to say I understand, and have much more compassion for, those that some pastors think have ulterior motives or hidden meaning. Just like many congregants have “roast pastor” for Sunday dinner, I’ve attended church staff meetings where flamed “EGR” was the featured entre’.

I’m afraid that too many pastors can only lead those that agree with them and have been deemed successful because they have found thousands of like minded individuals to join their congregations. In my opinion, that’s not leadership.  It’s an accidental parade.  Real leaders can lead diversity.  Alas, to my disappointment, John Maxwell didn’t use my suggestion for his current book, “Loving the Unlovable and Leading the Unleadable.”

Not everyone who disagrees with the pastor, brings an idea from another church, doesn’t speak the Shibboleth, etc. needs to be told “get thee behind me, Satan.”  When God brings a person to a church their baggage (experiences, passions, personality, hurts) comes with them.  I would suggest that this fact hasn’t surprised God in the least and that in fact He may have intended it.  In a strange twist of irony, one of the greatest lessons I learned at the specific church that “kicked me to the curb” is that “hurting people , hurt people.”  So, when that “annoying” congregant from another church hurts “your” church (that’s a completely different subject) it is most likely because they are hurting.  Consider it an honor that God would bring such hurting “sheeple” to your wide-open place and trust you with their healing.

Please allow me to offer some alternative translations to those listed above.  These are from the perspective of one who has been hurt. They come from several years of listening to those people that churches have dismissed as “un-whatever.”

“I’m looking for a church that preaches the Word!”

Translation: “I’ve got some theological baggage I’m working through.  I’m not sure I know your Shibboleth and I probably don’t know that I don’t know. It would be great if this is a church where people love me even when I don’t use the right terminology.”

“Lots of people have been coming to me and saying…”

Translation: “I’ve seen the patronizing, condescending ridicule thrown at people who have disagreed with leadership in the past and I’m too vulnerable to put myself out there like that, so I’ll hide behind some ‘straw-men.’”

Alt. Translation: “There really are a lot of people coming to me, but they’ve all been hurt before and I’m the only one naive enough to try to live out Matthew 18:15 around here.”

“I want a church that is more focused on discipleship”

Translation: “Wow, Barna was right. There really is a huge disconnect between what pastors think the spiritual health of the congregation is and what the average congregant experiences.”

“Don’t take this personally, but…”

Translation: “Hurting people, hurt people. I’m not really attacking you, I’m just really hurting right now and you’re in my line of fire. Just like Jesus said, ‘They will treat you this way because of Me…’ I might not know this, but I kind of hope you, as pastor, do.” (By the way, yes, I do know that it goes on to identify them as the ones that, “…do not know the One who sent me.” Someone unsaved in church deserves just as much ‘loving into the Kingdom’ as one on the outside.)

Alt. translation: “Even though I don’t know it, I’m desperately looking for a pastor that lives out what he preaches about loving people. Are you him?  I wonder if you actually read The Beatitudes…in particular v. 11-12.  I feel pretty unlovable, but have never met anyone that loves me enough to help me get out of my own way. Will you love me inspite of myself.”

Finally, yes, some sheep really do need an ocassional “dope-slap.”  (My word to congregations is, “Obey your leaders and submit to their authority.  They keep watch over you as men who must give an account.  Obey them so that their work will be a joy…”  Are you making your leaders’ work a joy?)   Unfortunately, there seems to be a trend toward that being the first pastoral option, rather than the last.

Aren’t we grateful that God doesn’t treat us pastors as we too often treat those He’s given us to feed, regardless of how they treat us.

P.S.  Sorry to drop this during Pastor Appreciation Month.  I write ‘em as they come to me.

Mercy Ships – Insurgent Love Navy

Many of you will already be familiar with the work of Mercy Ships.  I was first introduced to them in the early 90s when I had the privilege of installing several PCs on the Anastasis.  Simply put, the premise of this ministry and the effectiveness with which they fulfill it “ROCKS.”

http://www.mercyships.org

Mercy Ships programs promote health and well-being by serving the urgent surgical needs of the forgotten poor and empowering developing communities. Some quick facts about Mercy Ships:

• Since 1978, Mercy Ships has performed more than 1.7 million services valued at over $670 million and impacting more than 1.9 million people as direct beneficiaries.
• Performed more than 32,500 surgeries such as cleft lip and palate, cataract removal, straightening of crossed eyes, orthopaedic and facial reconstruction.
• Treated more than 212,000 people in village medical clinics. Performed more than 183,000 dental treatments.
• Taught over 14,500 local health care and professional workers, who have in turn trained many others in primary health care.
• Taught 95,000 local people in primary health care.
• Trained local medical professionals in modern health care techniques.
• Delivered more than $60 million worth of medical equipment, hospital supplies and medicines.
• Completed more than 900 community development projects including construction of schools, clinics, orphanages, water wells and agriculture programs.
• Demonstrated the love of God to people in over 550 port visits in 70 different nations.
• More than 850 career crew from over 40 nations serve today.
• More than 1,600 short-term volunteers serve with Mercy Ships each year.

Mission

Mercy Ships, a global charity, has operated a fleet of hospital ships in developing nations since 1978. Following the example of Jesus, Mercy Ships brings hope and healing to the poor, mobilizing people and resources worldwide

Vision

Mercy Ships seeks to become the face of love in action, bringing hope and healing to the poor.

Values

Desiring to follow the example of Jesus, we seek to:

1. Love God
2. Love and serve others
3. Be people of integrity
4. Be people of excellence in all we say and do

Wait…I just thought of something.  If a war of Insurgent Love is being fought then Mercy Ships must be the navy!  Oh, that’s just cool.

Now we need an Air Force!

Servant Partners

One of the challenges of featuring Love Insurgents is finding organizations that are also faith communities.  There are many charities that have impact on people’s lives, earthly lives that is.  There’s nothing wrong with that and, in fact, it’s mostly right.  But, the point of Insurgent Love is to have eternal impact.

I once heard Joni Erikson Tada talk about one day being like a thousand years, the well known scripture verse.  She spoke of it in terms of doing one kindness today to someone in need that results in that person receiving eternal life through Jesus.  In that one moment that day has become one thousand years, even an eternity, for that person.  Love Insurgents recognize that the point of their love and charity is for the recipient to ultimately accept the ultimate Love.

That describes “Servant Partners.”  Here’s an excerpt from their webpage, “‘Go and make disciples of all nations.’ We emphasize not simply gaining conversions or church-goers, but rather forming faith communities of disciples who are growing in maturity and obedience to Christ Jesus.

Servant Partners‘ purpose is to “…seek Jesus together by living and serving among the world’s urban poor.”  Servant Partner interns live, serve and love in urban centers that equip them to be life long Love Insurgents.

I’ll let them tell the rest of their story.  Check it out at http://www.servantpartners.org

Word Made Flesh and Sari Bari

I’ve been in a real “funk” lately.  Don’t know why.  Maybe it’s writers block.  After such a fast start to “Insurgent Love” it’s been disappointing to have “run dry.”  Maybe God wants me to stop talking and start equipping.  After all, the best way to get over yourself is to carry someone else’s burden…to minister to the widows and orphans.

So, I’m going to start a new category of blogs that’ll be a subset of “Insurgent Love.”  The time I normally spend writing I’ll spend searching out ministries that are actively engaged in loving behind enemy lines.  As I find these “Insurgent Warriors” I’ll post information, observations and links here on RealWords.  You can keep up to date with the ministries I find by following me on Twitter or Facebook.  There will be at least two new “Insurgent Love” ministries featured each week.

Here’s the first one: Word Made Flesh and their initiative Sari Bari.  You might already be familiar with Word Made Flesh, but not Sari Bari.  Sari Bari is “a business initiative, [which] seeks the freedom and restoration of Kolkata’s red-light areas through dignity-giving employment opportunities for women affected by the sex trade.”

Wow!  That’s off the hook!  Insurgent Love in action behind enemy lines!

Christians Protest Dante’s Inferno! (not really)

I laugh hardest when comedy stretches reality just one or two millimeters beyond itself.  Do you remember the Saturday Night Live commercials that were only one small step outside of realism?  Sometimes you couldn’t tell if they were real or not.

Or, how about the best Seinfeld routines?  Was the second spitter really any more plausible than Oliver Stone’s JFK?  How many of us know, or are, close talkers?

My particular favorites are when people take my personality quirks and just barely stretch them through imitation.  Through tears of laughter I ask, “Do I really do that?”  The answer from family and friends is inevitably “yes!”  It’s a chance for me to see myself through someone else’s eyes.  It’s a rare, and sometimes uncomfortable, gift.

Recently, those of us that call ourselves Christian were given this rare gift.  The creative PR folks at Electronic Arts gave us a rare chance to look at ourselves.  Using a viral marketing technique they staged a mock protest of their new game “Dante’s Inferno.”  You can read about it here: http://www.gamespot.com/news/6211829.html?part=rss&tag=gs_all_games&subj=6211829 It was such a good “production” that it fooled The Los Angeles Times for a while http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/06/e3-protesters-target-dantes-inferno-game.html.  The viral marketing also included a faux website.

The upstart to it all is that it didn’t real stretch reality all that much.  Protesters marched in front of  E3 at the Los Angeles Convention Center with “trade in your playstation for a praystation” posters and handed out tracts that read “a video game hero does not have the authority to save and damn… ONLY GOD CAN JUDGE and he will not judge the sinners who play this game kindly.”

Compared to some of the posters seen at the memorials to US service men these are rather tame.  Granted, those are extremes, but did the actors employed by EA really carry slogans any different than the bumper stickers some of us put on our cars.

As a consultant that seeks to help churches understand and relate to the culture of their times (like the Sons of Issachar) I have spent years striving, in vain, to truly see Christians and their churches through “outsiders’” eyes.  As I approach my thirtieth “spiritual” birthday it becomes extremely difficult to “remember my chains.”

Finally, thanks to the unsuspecting modern day prophets at EA I have just a glimpse of myself through the eyes of someone else.  I’m not laughing.  Do I understand why those “outside” Christianity find it funny?  Absolutely.  Do I blame them for finding it funny and entertaining?  Absolutley not!  I would find it hysterical if I were them.  And I hold no malice or contempt for anybody that chuckles, giggles, guffaws or ends up ROFLOL.  In fact, I choose to laugh with them.

But, for those of us that are “in the family”…well, it should break our hearts.  It should break our hearts that they’re right.  Their perspective is true and accurate.  We really do behave exactly as they have portrayed us.  Maybe not us personally, but that really doesn’t matter.  As a group we really are more “against” than we are “for.”    We really are more against homosexuality than we are for the homosexual; more against abortion than for the pregnant teen; more against pornography than for setting sex slaves free; more against a particular political view than for finding common ground to solve society’s problems.

And, true to form some Christians missed the opportunity to take a look at themselves and instead decided to take offense.  Christian commentators and bloggers came out attacking EA and the mock protest.  But, there is some encouraging news: many of the usual suspects in the “against” crowd haven’t stirred the pot.  Maybe, just maybe, we’re starting to abandon our failing “against” strategy.

I propose that we replace it with a new “for God, for people” approach.  In keeping with the whole internet/texting/tweetshrink groove I suggest it be the IALMFGATPHLTIAATSPDTIDLS (I’m A Lot More For God And The People He Loves Than I Am Against The Stuff People Do That I Don’t Like Strategy).  OK, so I’m not as clever as the PR people at EA.

Hey, wait!  Isn’t the IALMFGATPHLTIAATSPDTIDLS just the Greatest Commandment?  Love God…love people.

Anyway, who’s with me?